--- Kajima's research into earthquakes is superior in comparison with other companies, but what direction will research and development take in the future?
Nakajima The Great Hanshin Earthquake Disaster Prevention
Committee has been established with Mr.Kobori at the helm. This
committee is divided into six different fields and will implement
wide-spread surveys and establish measuresto cope with all events. In
further detail, these six fields will maintain asocial engineering
approach to external and internal back-up supplies for tremblers,
plate movement, construction, tremor absorption and tremor control,
and for civilians and society. The committee will consist of a variety
of related departments, such as the Kobori Research Laboratory, the
Technical Research Center, the Information System Department, the
Construction Technology Department and the Design and Engineering
General Affairs Departments, etc., and will provide reports whenever necessary.
Nojiri: In comparison with the other major general contractors,
Kajima has the highest levels of technology for earthquake
engineering, anti-earthquake measures, sway absorption and quake
control, and we are developing a wide range of new technologies. As we
move into the first stages of revival, the recently-developed
plate survey vehicle and other diagnostic equipment and software technology will come into use.

Terrestrial Survey
Vehicle, Geo-Explorer
The main themes for the future include increased accuracy of this
diagnostic technology and strengthening of repair and reinforcement
technology. I'm sure there will be reviews of design methods, and
there is a great necessity for us to come up with proposals which
swiftly enable capable configurations and engineering methods. I also
feel that there will be an increase in the need to reinforce old buildings to meet current standards.
Kobori: That in itself is a problem that affects
society. Buildings conforming to the new standards escaped damage
while older building crumbled. This leaves us with the question of
what to do with the older buildings. The question of how to go about
examining and reinforcing older buildings will not find asimple
answer. It will take both money and time. It would be nice if all
owners recognized the necessity of taking these measures, but as time
passes they are sure to forget the pain they have lived through. It is
too late after disaster strikes, but a warning prior to a disaster
raises the question of whether an earthquake really is imminent. It is
important to determine exactly how reinforcements will be carried out
on structures deemed to be dangerous to society, but this will presen
t us with legal problems.
--- What do you think will raise the most questions over the medium to
long-term?
Nojiri: Sway absorption technology for civil engineering
projects. I feel that the largest technical question will examine
whether it is possible to include sway absorption technology in existing bridges.
Kojima: We have already received many inquiries from the
affected areas of Kobeon the possibility of including quake control
and sway absorption in existing buildings.
Kobori: This problem does not only affect the Hanshin areas of
Kobe. I think we should expend more effort on other
cities. Unfortunately there is very little awareness of this and this
seems to be the real problem. The question of future measures,
including anti-quake diagnostics, and the necessity of systemized
structures which incorporate quake control and sway absorption are not
current topics of discussion, we knew about them ten years ago.
Nakajima: Quake control and sway absorption technology attracts
much attention whenever an earthquake occurs, but I feel that this
will play an important role in future propagation.
--- And lastly, having had direct supervision over the affected area,
what are your plans for the future, Mr.Kojima?
Kojima: Although a certain proportion of our staff are actual
employees, all were directly affected by the disaster. Despite this, I
was deeply struck by the physical and mental health of them
all. Everybody strived to put in anappearance at the constructions
they were involved in without being directed. Regardless of the
transportation confusion in the two or three days following the quake,
nearly all employees managed to do this. We were consequently highly
praised by all clients. Although this is to be expected of technical
specialists, I thought it absolutely incredible that so many people
made themselves available before even taking care of their own
affairs.
A total of 340 people from a wide range of departments within
this branch, including 170 relief volunteers, sweated blood and tears
to carry out site management, diagnostics, surveys and deal with
clients. The lifeline into Kobe has yet to be revived, and people are
still expending every effort while sleeping on-site and in borrowed
buses. I am also indebted to doctors dispatched to the area at the
earliest possible moment for providing us with the will to
continue. The word 'revival' can recently be commonly heard. However,
from my observations of the affected area, I feel that we are still
struggling to return daily life functions, the infrastructure and
managerial functions, and that we still live in danger of secondary
disaster. Although the word 'revival' contains the nuance of hope, we
must not forget to watch where we step. We must proceed very
carefully. Of course, the work of the various planning groups are
giving us a glimpse of revival, and I feel that it is the duty of Kajima to provide positive support for this.
--- Thank you very much. I am sure that the branch staff and relief
workers must be exhausted working in such a harsh environment with the
end of the tunnel not yet in sight, but I wish them all well. Keep up the good work.
|
|
All Right Reserved,Copyright(c)Kajima Corporation 1995